3 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• rtstrstrs commented  ·  April 16, 2011 3:03 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  K-Lite is shit.
  VLC is shit.
  MPC with CoreAVC and DivX codec = all you need.

• Meesles commented  ·  February 14, 2011 1:22 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This has some information: http://www.anandtech.com/show/3786/hd-video-decoding-on-gpus-with-vlc-110/5

  It is clear when you run one vs. the other that MPC is more stable, regardless of what you may think with the system folders. VLC is aimed to be a one-size-fits-all application that spans across every platform, when clearly the millions of ways of encoding a video and audio cannot be put simply into one application.

  Besides, just run a video in both, MPC feels much more stable and clean than VLC.

• qw commented  ·  February 14, 2011 11:47 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  very funny: ?
  how can an application with codecs installed in system folder(which make the system unstable (which is already buggy)) be more stable than application which comes with its own codecs.
  VLC and MPLayer are best video applications for Windows and not only